{"id":7927,"date":"2023-04-16T17:34:07","date_gmt":"2023-04-16T17:34:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/365moviesbyday.bryanbuser.com\/?p=7927"},"modified":"2023-12-08T00:22:55","modified_gmt":"2023-12-08T00:22:55","slug":"about-time","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/365moviesbyday.bryanbuser.com\/about-time\/","title":{"rendered":"About Time (2013)"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"aboutAbout Time<\/em> was a movie I watched for the first time a year after its 2013 release date.\u00a0 Despite relatively high Rotten Tomatoes scores<\/a> (70% critics, 81% audience), I recall being unimpressed by it. Many accounts I follow on TikTok are of people giving film reviews. While most, if not all, of those I follow in this niche, are younger than me, more often than not, I generally agree with their assessments (hence, my reason for following them). So often, About Time<\/em> is referenced in a video. The film is often called beautiful, poetic, and devastating. Some have gone so far as to call it a gut punch. Those characteristics I seek out in my romantic dramas, so I signed up for the rewatch, thinking I must have missed something. It turns out that I didn’t. My second viewing did hold my interest more than my first, but it still felt very average. I’m even more uncertain now about what others see in this film that I missed.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Time travel movies take a lot of work to do correctly. They are even harder to get right when a film transitions back and forth between the past and present day. Nevertheless, it’s a popular genre and has produced some incredible ones. A great time travel movie is one that you’ll remember for a long time. Some of the best ones I’ve seen are\u00a0Back to the Future,\u00a0Interstellar<\/a>, Groundhog Day,\u00a0Arrival<\/a>, Safety Not Guaranteed, Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure, Frequency, The Terminator, Terminator 2: Judgment Day.<\/em>\u00a0Palm Springs<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>The Jacket<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>Midnight in Paris<\/a>,\u00a0<\/i>and\u00a0Deja Vu.<\/em>\u00a0But when time travel movies are bad, they can be dreadful. Examples include\u00a0Source Code, The Time Traveler’s Wife, Looper, Edge of Tomorrow<\/em>\u00a0(I realize I am in the vast minority on this one),\u00a0Last Night in Soho, Timeline, Freejack,<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Back to the Future Part III<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Ironically,\u00a0About Time<\/em>\u00a0is one of two Rachel McAdams (Mean Girls,\u00a0 The Notebook<\/em>) time travel romance movies with the word “time” as part of the title released in the 2000s. Each I wanted to enjoy. Each I did not. About Time is definitively better, though I would have more thoroughly enjoyed the more dramatic themes of\u00a0The Time Traveler’s Wife<\/em>, all things else being equal.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

\"about<\/p>\n

On his 21st birthday, Tim (Domhnall Gleeson –\u00a0Ex Machina<\/a>,\u00a0Brooklyn<\/a><\/em>) learns from his father (Bill Nighy –\u00a0Living<\/a>,\u00a0Hope Gap<\/a>)<\/em>that the men in their family have the ability to travel back in time to revisit (and potentially alter) moments in their life. Fair enough. This sounds like the much-beloved\u00a0Groundhog Day<\/em>. Unfortunately, this is where many of the similarities end.\u00a0Groundhog Day<\/em>\u00a0is a romantic comedy and doesn’t try to be anything more than that. Bill Murray’s character repeatedly lives the same day in perpetuity until he can get it ideally with the film’s love interest. Lovely and fun, with some great quips.\u00a0About Time<\/em>\u00a0tries to be something more. It’s not even that it tries to be something more because that is operating under the assumption that director Richard Curtis (Love Actually, Notting Hill<\/em>) used Groundhog Day as his template.<\/p>\n

Tim is a well-to-do Brit who seems to have much working for him, except for when it comes to females. His awkwardness in social interactions or romantic situations fumbles it all away. He is smitten when he blindly meets Mary (McAdams), but through his unintentional creepiness (and her boyfriend), he pushes her away. He continually uses his newly discovered power to go back in time to change the outcome. Unfortunately, this is where the film’s continuity hits its first snag. If, as we originally learned, Tim can only go back and relive or change events that he experienced, how can he suddenly revert to the time and place where Mary and her boyfriend meet, allowing Tim to distance the couple before they even have had a chance to start a conversation? That’s a big problem that many will find difficulty in suspending belief.<\/p>\n

\"aboutAbout Time<\/em>\u00a0throws in an additional caveat that you can’t go back after a certain life event occurs. Without giving anything away, as soon as this life event occurs, there isn’t a way to change past outcomes without it having a profound, unwelcome change in the future. So when Tim’s sister Kit Kat falls upon hard times and finds herself in a truly tragic situation, Tim is forced to choose whether to use his powers to change this event from ever occurring, knowing that returning to his now present day will forever be changed. This is where I find the most fault with the film. What is Curtis going for? Is\u00a0About Time<\/em>\u00a0a situational romance, or is about more about an undeveloped theme of sibling bonding? Perhaps it’s neither of these, but rather the tenderness between a loving father and a son he is attempting to guide? The lack of clarity divides this film into clunky chunks and almost pushes McAdams’s Mary to the backburner.<\/p>\n

There is an underlying message in\u00a0About Time<\/em>\u00a0that we should all live each day like it’s our last. There is no denying that. At the same time, that’s not exactly revolutionary. There are days in our lives that many of us would like to revisit (maybe even over and over) without trying to change anything but appreciating the good and evil instead. This aspect of the movie is sweet. But, of course, more is needed for a full-length feature. Curtis was a bit ambitious with the story he hoped to tell. As a result, About Time had a script that was all over the place, leaving us with characters who, while endearing, felt challenging to relate to.<\/p>\n

Plot 5\/10
\nCharacter Development 6\/10
\nCharacter Chemistry 7\/10
\nActing 7\/10
\nScreenplay 5.5\/10
\nDirecting\u00a0 7\/10
\nCinematography 7.5\/10
\nSound 6\/10
\nHook and Reel 7\/10
\nUniversal Relevance 7\/10
\n65%<\/p>\n

Movies You Might Like If You Liked This Movie<\/strong><\/p>\n