“Inspired by true events” versus “this is a true story” are two very different things. The first could mean anything. It’s harder to get upset when you find out fact and fiction don’t always meet eye to eye. However, when told that what you are about to see is a true story, only to find out later that facts (both minor and major) have changed along the way, you have the right to get a bit more upset. Actual events inspire The Good Lie. And while they bring light to a critical issue, the character story was primarily fictional, as far as I can tell. Now, this brings up an interesting conversation. Would you rather see a strictly factual movie that doesn’t tell the most exciting story, or one based on an actual situation but with, for the most part, specific characters and conditions that are more fictionalized?

I’m careful with what to write here, not because I’m worried that I’ll give away any spoilers, but because I don’t want to knock a movie that I thought was good. Heartwarming might not be the best word here, as the main characters in this movie have endured horrific situations throughout their lives. But if this story were all doom and gloom, would it attract the audience that a story like The Good Lie hopes to attract? You want to shed light on specific issues while also offering hope. That is what this movie does. Nonetheless, the topic is open to debate because only a tiny percentage of stories related to the brutal 1983 Civil War between Northern and Southern Sudan ended as positively as the one told in The Good Lie.

Reese Witherspoon (Walk the Line, Wild) is the only name you’ll recognize in this film, but she is by no means the star. So is the film better off for having her? Most movies are better off with Witherspoon as a star than without. The movie is better because she is in it. And it certainly helped bring audiences to the theaters. And while the film needed her to succeed, and while she did a great job, she was the first to say that this story is by no means about her. She just wanted to raise awareness of the story in the best way she could.

The year is 1983, and the North and South are at war. Specifically, the South Sudanese are living under fire from the government of Sudan. Armed northern shooters storm into villages and kill at will. This is where the first part of our story takes place. After their mother and father, and just about everyone else they knew, are murdered, older brother Theo (around age 12) leads his younger sister Abital (around age 10) and younger brother Mamere (around age 9) on a 260-mile walk from their home. They travel to the border of Ethiopia, where they are advised to go if anything happens. Along the way, they meet up with Jeremiah and Paul (both around age 9). Watching what these young children do is essential because their characters are genuinely defined here. Their story continues as they walk over 300 more miles to reach the border with Kenya. Along the way, they experience great hardship. Finally, they reach the Kakuma refugee camp, where they spend the next 13 years.

A humanitarian organization is set up, where 3600 of these young people would have the opportunity to come to America. “The Lost Boys,” as they are called (mainly because most of those who get this opportunity are males), are placed in different parts of the United States. In our story, Mamere, Jeremiah, and Paul are assigned to Kansas City, MO, where they meet their employment specialist, Carrie (Witherspoon). Faith-based charities sponsor the boys, but a mix-up puts Carrie in the role of the first person they meet, so they look to her as their savior. Carrie doesn’t exactly have her life together. She’s not a bad person by any means, but her job as an employment specialist is just that—a job. So, without even saying anything, we know where this story is going. She learns more about the young men and what they’ve been through, and how they can remain so positive despite the lives they have been dealt. And as a result, she becomes more involved with their stories, and we start to see her as more than just an employment specialist. All three boys are fortunate to have a new chance at life, but that does not mean everything goes as smoothly as they wish in this foreign land. They still have their traditions. And more importantly, they still have their morals and value systems.

Unfortunately for them, because their hearts are so pure, they find themselves getting into a little bit of trouble on more than one occasion. As time passes in this new country, which is becoming more familiar to them, they begin to separate from each other. All three characters have conflicted emotions, and why would they not? Their lives have been uprooted (in an attempt to give them a better chance in this world), yet they miss the friends they made in Kenya and wonder why they were “selected” when so many others were not. Other problems arise in this movie, which I will not discuss here.

I recommend this movie. It falls in that 11-15 range of the top films of 2014.

Plot 8/10
Character Development 9/10
Character Chemistry 8.5/10
Acting 8/10
Screenplay 8/10
Directing  9/10
Cinematography 10/10
Sound 9/10
Hook and Reel 8.5/10
Universal Relevance 9/10
87%

B

Movies You Might Like If You Liked This Movie

• The Blind Side
• Lion
• Hotel Rwanda
• The Namesake
• Antwone Fisher