Oh, man, what a fantastic movie is. This was actually my second viewing of The Hours. I first watched it back in 2010 and remembered being extremely surprised by how much I enjoyed it. I would not have given this movie a chance back when it came out in 2002, but my interests in films have changed dramatically since then. Now that’s not to say I still can’t enjoy a blockbuster (I actually watched Captain America: Civil War earlier in the same day and loved it), but I am much more into the human aspect of independent dramas like The Hours than I am about action movies or comedies. This movie deals with depression, a topic that I am, unfortunately, very familiar with. And it does it from three different time periods with three different stories that are loosely at times (and not so loosely) during others. This movie knotted Nicole Kidman (Cold Mountain, Rabbit Hole) with, surprisingly, just her third nomination to date (as of May 2016) and her first and only win. With a prosthetic nose, she was virtually unrecognizable as Virginia Woolf. But it wasn’t her physical characteristics that stood out. It was how she immersed herself in the role of a woman who you would think had it all but was so mentally troubled that she could not find any happiness in her life. An accomplished actress, this is the performance of her career in a movie that shouldn’t be missed by anybody who views life with a cup half empty sort of mentality.
Continue reading The Hours (2002)
Category Archives: Ed Harris
A History of Violence (2005)
I remember when I first saw A History of Violence in the theaters in 2005. It was not what I was expecting at all. I remember thinking the movie was decent, but not what I expected. This was also when I started to get into the Oscars. I remember being flabbergasted when William Hurt (The Doctor, Children of a Lesser God) received a Best Supporting Actor nomination. At that time, my beef with his nomination was that he was only in one scene (basically the last scene in the movie). To warrant this kind of acclaim, I felt that you needed to be on the screen for more than 15 minutes. As I watched it again (for just the second time ever) last night, I realized that he didn’t deserve the nomination, not because he was only on the screen for 15 minutes, but because his performance sucked. He was such a minor character, and anyone could have played this performance, and it wouldn’t have affected the movie. If anybody deserved a nomination for this movie, it would have been Viggo Mortenson (The Road, Eastern Promises), who, as he always seems to do, hit a home run as this movie’s lead.
Continue reading A History of Violence (2005)
Jeff Who Lives At Home (2012)
The unassuming yet hilarious Jason Segel (Forgetting Sarah Marshall, I Love You, Man) further shows his range in the low-grossing but critically acclaimed Jeff Who Lives At Home. The movie, co-written and co-directed by brothers Mark and Jay Duplass (Cyrus, Baghead), is classified as a comedy but is more than just a barrel of laughs. Some true-to-life scenarios are tackled here and not passed off to get a chuckle from the audience. These include seeking personal life fulfillment, dealing with aging alone, and a terrible sense of self when learning that your partner is having an affair. I compare the movie to Little Miss Sunshine or Juno, but it’s much funnier, and the more dramatic storylines occur more naturally and aren’t as forced on you. Jeff Who Lives at Home is a good movie on your couch on a rainy Saturday afternoon. While it will never wow you, if you let it, it will surprise you and leave you with a good taste in your mouth.
Continue reading Jeff Who Lives At Home (2012)
Pollock (2000)
Ed Harris (The Abyss, The Hours) delivers the performance of his career in Pollock, the story of American artist Jackson Pollock, who revolutionized American painting in the 1940s in New York City. Harris, who also directed the movie, portrays Pollock as an emotionally and mentally unstable wreck of a human being whose personal demons were often overshadowed, or should I say overlooked, by his adept skill in abstract painting. His use of dripping and splattering wild combinations of colors was unique and new and captured the attention of some of America’s most notable artists, museum owners, and journalists.